DOES AUDIT QUALITY IMPROVE AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MANDATORY AUDIT PARTNER ROTATION?
Vol. 12, Nr. 2/2013 , p263..279
Author(s):
Gary MONROE Sarowar HOSSAIN
Keywords:
going-concern opinion, audit partner tenure, distressed companies, mandatory rotation
Abstract:
We investigate whether audit partner tenure and
audit quality associations remain significant after the implementation of
mandatory audit partner rotation. Carey and Simnett (2006) report a significant
negative association between long audit partner tenure and the propensity to
issue qualified going-concern opinions for financially distressed companies.
However, their study uses data from a period when there was no restriction on
the length of audit partner tenure, i.e., from a period before there was mandatory
audit partner rotation after a fixed period of time. We revisit this issue
using Australian data from a period after the introduction of mandatory audit
partner rotation. We find a significant positive association between audit
partner tenure when tenure is five years or more and the likelihood of an
auditor issuing a going-concern opinion for a financially distressed company.
Our findings provide evidence that auditors are more likely to issue qualified
going-concern opinions for financially distressed companies when there is
mandatory audit partner rotation after a fixed period of time. Our findings
suggest that the implementation of mandatory audit partner rotation has
improved audit quality.
Download:
http://online-cig.ase.ro/jcig/art/paper_1850.pdf
Back
|
|